Validez, confiabilidad y factores determinantes de la escala de agresividad social en adolescentes
Palabras clave:
validez, confiabilidad, factores determinantes, agresividadResumen
Introducción: la agresividad es una manifestación de violencia, que se evidencia con mayor frecuencia en la adolescencia. Se requiere un instrumento que permita identificar problemas conductuales de forma premeditada e impulsiva, para establecer una convivencia adecuada.
Objetivo: determinar la validez, la confiabilidad y los factores determinantes de la escala de la agresividad social mediante un enfoque orientado hacia el adolescente.
Método: estudio instrumental realizado en 2184 estudiantes (49,04 % mujeres) con edades comprendidas entre los 14 a 17 años (M = 15,39; DE = 0.98), y se distribuyeron en dos partes: validez y confiabilidad (1100) y factores determinantes (1084). El instrumento de medición fue el cuestionario de agresividad premeditada e impulsiva en adolescentes.
Resultados: el cuestionario presentó un modelo unifactorial con un coeficiente omega de McDonald de 0,85, se obtuvo tendencia media en relación a los niveles de agresividad, y se evidenciaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en relación al sexo y por las actividades que realizan en el tiempo libre, con rango promedio mayor para los hombres y en aquellos que pasan más tiempo en redes sociales.
Conclusiones: la escala de agresividad social representa un instrumento útil, que debe considerarse en el ámbito educativo para identificar problemas conductuales.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
1. Pinazo D, García – Prieto L, García – Castellar R. Implementación de un programa basado en mindfulness para la reducción de la agresividad en el aula. Rev psicodidact. 2020; 25(1): 30-35. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2019.08.004
2. Sil E. The effects of therapeutic group drumming with Korean middle school students on aggression as related to school violence prevention. Arts Psychother. 2019; 66: 101583. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2019.101583
3. García M, Ríos M, Carrillo C, Sabuco E. The moderating role of resilience in the relationship between academic burnout and the perception of psychological health in nursing students. Educ. Psychol. 2018; 38(1): 1-13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1044944
4. Pinel – Martínez C, Pérez – Fuentes M, Carrión – Martínez J. Relación entre género, resiliencia y autoconcepto académico y social en la adolescencia. J. Educ. Psychol. 2019; 14(2): 112-123. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2019.02.176
5. Prendergast B, Zucker I. Social behavior: Developmental timing defies puberty. Curr Biol 2018; 28(9): 553-555. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.040
6. Chu A. Adolescent reactive and proactive aggression, and bullying in Hong Kong: Prevalence, psychosocial correlates, and prevention. J Adolesc Health 2019; 64: S65−S72. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.018
7. Martínez A, Ruiz-Rico G, Zurita F, Chacón R, Castro M, Cachón J. Actividad física y conductas agresivas en adolescentes en régimen de acogimiento residencial. Suma Psicol. 2017; 24: 135-141. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2017.02.002
8. Aloba O, Opakunle T, Ogunrinu O. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF): Dimensionality, validity, reliability and gender invariance among Nigerian adolescents. Child Abuse Negl. 2020; 101: 104357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104357
9. Bouquet G, García – Méndez M, Díaz – Loving R, Rivera – Aragón S. Conceptuación y medición de la agresividad: validación de una escala. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2019; 28: 115-130. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n1.70184
10. Reyes J, Hernández D, Juárez I, Tovilla C, López L, Villar M, González T, Fresan A. Evaluación psicológica de la agresividad impulsiva/predeterminada y factores asociados: Un estudio transversal en usuarios de los servicios de salud en Tabasco, México. Salud mental 2016; 39(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2015.064
11. Thomas R. College student peer aggression: A review with applications for colleges and universities. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 48: 218-229. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.013
12. Roser A, Suriá R, Mateo M. Problemas de conducta infantil y competencias parentales en madres en contextos de violencia de género. Gac. Sanit. 2018; 32(1): 35-40. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.02.004
13. Kashy G, Aizenkot D. Exposure to cyberbullying in WhatsApp classmates‘groups and classroom climate as predictors of students‘sense of belonging: A multi-level analysis of elementary, middle and high schools. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 108: 104614. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104614
14. Li Y, Binti N, Binti Z, Zhang L, Roslan S. Effectiveness of group interpersonal psychotherapy for decreasing aggression and increasing social support among Chinese university students: A randomized controlled study. J. Affect. Disord. 2018; 251: 274-279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.051
15. Portnow S, Downer J, Brown J. Reductions in aggressive behavior within the context of a universal, social emotional learning program: Classroom- and student-level mechanisms. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018; 68: 38–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.004
16. Lessels J, Bishop T. A post-event stratified random sampling scheme for monitoring event-based water quality using an automatic sampler. J. Hydrol. 2020; 580: 123393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.063
17. Andreu J, Peña M, Ramírez J. Cuestionario de agresión reactiva y proactiva: un instrumento de medida de la agresión en adolescentes. Rev. Psicopatol. Psicol. Clin. 2009; 14(1): 37-49. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.14.num.1.2009.4065
18. Gálvez P, Boleto A, Romero R. Validación de la versión reducida del CECASDEP en usuarios de servicios deportivos. Suma Psicol. 2015; 22(2): 78-85. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2015.08.001
19. Chung – Ying L, Jung – Der W, Ming – Chyi P, Li – Jung K. Measuring burden in dementia caregivers: Confirmatory factor analysis for short forms of the Zarit Burden Interview. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017; 68: 8-13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.005
20. Kudo S, Fujimoto M, Sato T, Nagano A. Determination of the optimal number of linked rigid-bodies of the trunk during walking and running based on Akaike’s information criterion. Gait Posture. 2020; 77: 264-268. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.02.009
21. Barrera – Barrera R, Navarro – García A, Peris – Ortiz M. El papel de la invarianza factorial en la validación del constructo calidad de servicio electrónico.
Rev. europe. direc. econom. empres. 2015; 24 (1): 13-24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2014.07.001
22. Oliveira T, Benedita C. Dataset for understanding why people share their travel experiences on social media: Structural equation model analysis. Data Brief 2020; 30: 105447. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105447
23. Burga – León A, Escurra – Mayaute M. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de deseabilidad social de Marlowe y Crowne en docentes peruanos. Liberabit 2017; 23(2): 189-210. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2017.v23n2.03
24. Shapka J, Maghsoudi R. Examining the validity and reliability of the cyber-aggression and cyber-victimization scale. Comput Human Behav 2017; 69: 10-17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.015
25. Cruz A, Castro – Rodríguez A, Rundle B, Berrios – Torres I, Abrunhosa R, Barbosa F, Standford M. Versatility and exploratory psychometric properties of the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS): A review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 47: 12-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.003
26. Tudkuea T, Laeheem K, Sittichai R. Development of a causal relationship model for cyber bullying behaviors among public secondary school students in the three southern border provinces of Thailand. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2019; 102: 145-149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.013
27. Song M, Zhu Z, Liu S, Fan H, Zhu T, Zhang L. Effects of aggressive traits on cyberbullying: Mediated moderation or moderated mediation?. Comput Human Behav 2019; 97: 167–178. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.015
28. Zhang C, Xu W, Lu H. Longitudinal relationship between inferiority and aggression in Chinese college students: The moderation of left-behind experience. Pers Individ Dif. 2020; 156: 109791. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109791
29. Zhang J, Slesnick N. Academic performance and delinquent and aggressive behaviors among children with substance using mothers. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 109: 104683. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104683
30. Dowsett A, Jackson M. The effect of violence and competition within video games on aggression. Comput Human Behav. 2019; 99: 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.002
31. Lin S, Yu C, Chen J, Zhang W, Cao L, Liu L. Predicting adolescent aggressive behavior from community violence exposure, deviant peer affiliation and school engagement: A one-year longitudinal study. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 111: 104840. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104840
32. Lee P, Bierman K. Longitudinal trends and year-to-year fluctuations in student–teacher conflict and closeness: Associations with aggressive behavior problems. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018; 70: 1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.06.002
33. Nikel L. Submissiveness, assertiveness and aggressiveness in school-age children: The role of self-efficacy and the Big Five. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104746
34. Lei H, Ming C, Cui Y, Li S, Lu M. Changes in aggression among mainland Chinese elementary, junior high, and senior high school students across years: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 48: 190-196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.014
2. Sil E. The effects of therapeutic group drumming with Korean middle school students on aggression as related to school violence prevention. Arts Psychother. 2019; 66: 101583. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2019.101583
3. García M, Ríos M, Carrillo C, Sabuco E. The moderating role of resilience in the relationship between academic burnout and the perception of psychological health in nursing students. Educ. Psychol. 2018; 38(1): 1-13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1044944
4. Pinel – Martínez C, Pérez – Fuentes M, Carrión – Martínez J. Relación entre género, resiliencia y autoconcepto académico y social en la adolescencia. J. Educ. Psychol. 2019; 14(2): 112-123. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2019.02.176
5. Prendergast B, Zucker I. Social behavior: Developmental timing defies puberty. Curr Biol 2018; 28(9): 553-555. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.040
6. Chu A. Adolescent reactive and proactive aggression, and bullying in Hong Kong: Prevalence, psychosocial correlates, and prevention. J Adolesc Health 2019; 64: S65−S72. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.018
7. Martínez A, Ruiz-Rico G, Zurita F, Chacón R, Castro M, Cachón J. Actividad física y conductas agresivas en adolescentes en régimen de acogimiento residencial. Suma Psicol. 2017; 24: 135-141. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2017.02.002
8. Aloba O, Opakunle T, Ogunrinu O. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF): Dimensionality, validity, reliability and gender invariance among Nigerian adolescents. Child Abuse Negl. 2020; 101: 104357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104357
9. Bouquet G, García – Méndez M, Díaz – Loving R, Rivera – Aragón S. Conceptuación y medición de la agresividad: validación de una escala. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2019; 28: 115-130. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n1.70184
10. Reyes J, Hernández D, Juárez I, Tovilla C, López L, Villar M, González T, Fresan A. Evaluación psicológica de la agresividad impulsiva/predeterminada y factores asociados: Un estudio transversal en usuarios de los servicios de salud en Tabasco, México. Salud mental 2016; 39(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2015.064
11. Thomas R. College student peer aggression: A review with applications for colleges and universities. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 48: 218-229. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.013
12. Roser A, Suriá R, Mateo M. Problemas de conducta infantil y competencias parentales en madres en contextos de violencia de género. Gac. Sanit. 2018; 32(1): 35-40. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.02.004
13. Kashy G, Aizenkot D. Exposure to cyberbullying in WhatsApp classmates‘groups and classroom climate as predictors of students‘sense of belonging: A multi-level analysis of elementary, middle and high schools. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 108: 104614. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104614
14. Li Y, Binti N, Binti Z, Zhang L, Roslan S. Effectiveness of group interpersonal psychotherapy for decreasing aggression and increasing social support among Chinese university students: A randomized controlled study. J. Affect. Disord. 2018; 251: 274-279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.051
15. Portnow S, Downer J, Brown J. Reductions in aggressive behavior within the context of a universal, social emotional learning program: Classroom- and student-level mechanisms. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018; 68: 38–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.004
16. Lessels J, Bishop T. A post-event stratified random sampling scheme for monitoring event-based water quality using an automatic sampler. J. Hydrol. 2020; 580: 123393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.063
17. Andreu J, Peña M, Ramírez J. Cuestionario de agresión reactiva y proactiva: un instrumento de medida de la agresión en adolescentes. Rev. Psicopatol. Psicol. Clin. 2009; 14(1): 37-49. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.14.num.1.2009.4065
18. Gálvez P, Boleto A, Romero R. Validación de la versión reducida del CECASDEP en usuarios de servicios deportivos. Suma Psicol. 2015; 22(2): 78-85. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2015.08.001
19. Chung – Ying L, Jung – Der W, Ming – Chyi P, Li – Jung K. Measuring burden in dementia caregivers: Confirmatory factor analysis for short forms of the Zarit Burden Interview. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017; 68: 8-13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.005
20. Kudo S, Fujimoto M, Sato T, Nagano A. Determination of the optimal number of linked rigid-bodies of the trunk during walking and running based on Akaike’s information criterion. Gait Posture. 2020; 77: 264-268. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.02.009
21. Barrera – Barrera R, Navarro – García A, Peris – Ortiz M. El papel de la invarianza factorial en la validación del constructo calidad de servicio electrónico.
Rev. europe. direc. econom. empres. 2015; 24 (1): 13-24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2014.07.001
22. Oliveira T, Benedita C. Dataset for understanding why people share their travel experiences on social media: Structural equation model analysis. Data Brief 2020; 30: 105447. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105447
23. Burga – León A, Escurra – Mayaute M. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de deseabilidad social de Marlowe y Crowne en docentes peruanos. Liberabit 2017; 23(2): 189-210. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2017.v23n2.03
24. Shapka J, Maghsoudi R. Examining the validity and reliability of the cyber-aggression and cyber-victimization scale. Comput Human Behav 2017; 69: 10-17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.015
25. Cruz A, Castro – Rodríguez A, Rundle B, Berrios – Torres I, Abrunhosa R, Barbosa F, Standford M. Versatility and exploratory psychometric properties of the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS): A review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 47: 12-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.003
26. Tudkuea T, Laeheem K, Sittichai R. Development of a causal relationship model for cyber bullying behaviors among public secondary school students in the three southern border provinces of Thailand. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2019; 102: 145-149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.013
27. Song M, Zhu Z, Liu S, Fan H, Zhu T, Zhang L. Effects of aggressive traits on cyberbullying: Mediated moderation or moderated mediation?. Comput Human Behav 2019; 97: 167–178. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.015
28. Zhang C, Xu W, Lu H. Longitudinal relationship between inferiority and aggression in Chinese college students: The moderation of left-behind experience. Pers Individ Dif. 2020; 156: 109791. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109791
29. Zhang J, Slesnick N. Academic performance and delinquent and aggressive behaviors among children with substance using mothers. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 109: 104683. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104683
30. Dowsett A, Jackson M. The effect of violence and competition within video games on aggression. Comput Human Behav. 2019; 99: 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.002
31. Lin S, Yu C, Chen J, Zhang W, Cao L, Liu L. Predicting adolescent aggressive behavior from community violence exposure, deviant peer affiliation and school engagement: A one-year longitudinal study. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 111: 104840. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104840
32. Lee P, Bierman K. Longitudinal trends and year-to-year fluctuations in student–teacher conflict and closeness: Associations with aggressive behavior problems. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018; 70: 1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.06.002
33. Nikel L. Submissiveness, assertiveness and aggressiveness in school-age children: The role of self-efficacy and the Big Five. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104746
34. Lei H, Ming C, Cui Y, Li S, Lu M. Changes in aggression among mainland Chinese elementary, junior high, and senior high school students across years: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2019; 48: 190-196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.014
Descargas
Publicado
2024-04-25
Cómo citar
1.
Carranza Escudero AY, Mejia Pinedo davis A, Castillo Saavedra EF, Reyes Alfaro CE, Perez León Camborda JR. Validez, confiabilidad y factores determinantes de la escala de agresividad social en adolescentes. Rev. Hosp. Psiq. Habana [Internet]. 25 de abril de 2024 [citado 18 de agosto de 2025];21(1). Disponible en: https://revhph.sld.cu/index.php/hph/article/view/497
Número
Sección
Artículo original
